Yellow diamond engagement rings tiffany 2018

Date: 15.10.2018, 06:07 / Views: 85433
Закрыть ... [X]

An engagement ring is a indicating that the person wearing it is to be, especially in Western cultures. A ring is presented as an gift by a partner to their prospective spouse when they propose marriage or directly after a marriage proposal is accepted. It represents a formal agreement to future marriage. In Western countries, engagement rings are worn mostly by women, and rings can feature or other. In some cultures, men and women wear matching rings, and engagement rings may also be used as wedding rings. In Anglo-Saxon countries, the ring is customarily worn on the left hand, but customs vary considerably elsewhere across the world.

Neither the engagement nor any other ring is worn during the wedding ceremony, when the is put by the groom on the finger of the bride as part of the ceremony, and sometimes by the bride onto the groom's finger. After the wedding, the engagement ring is usually put back on, and is usually worn on the outside of the wedding ring. Some brides have their engagement and wedding rings permanently soldered together after the wedding.



Ancient times[]

Although the ancient Egyptians are sometimes credited with having invented the engagement ring, and the ancient Greeks with having adopted the tradition, the history of the engagement ring can only be reliably traced as far back as ancient Rome.

In many countries, engagement rings are placed on the ring finger of the left hand. At one time it was believed that this finger contained a vein (the ) that led to the heart. This idea was popularized by in A treatise of Spousals, or Matrimonial Contracts (1686). The story seems to have its origin in the ancient Roman book Attic Nights by quoting 's Aegyptiacorum, where the alleged vein was originally a nervus (a word that can be translated either as "nerve" or "sinew").

The popular belief that an engagement ring was originally part of the which represented purchase and ownership of the bride, has been called into question by contemporary scholarship.:42 note 105

In the second century BC, the Roman bride-to-be was given two rings, a gold one which she wore in public, and one made of iron which she wore at home while attending to household duties. At one time Roman citizens wore rings made of iron. In later years senators who served as ambassadors were given gold for official use when abroad. Later the privilege of wearing gold rings was extended to other public officials, then to the knights, later to all, and finally under, to. For several centuries it was the custom for Romans to wear iron rings at home, gold rings in public. During this period a girl or woman might receive two engagement rings, one of iron and one of gold.

Middle ages[]

The mid-7th century required "that when the ceremony of betrothal has been performed,..., and the ring shall have been given or accepted as a pledge, although nothing may have been committed to writing, the promise shall, under no circumstances, be broken."

In 860 AD, wrote a letter to in reply to questions regarding differences between Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox practices. Pope Nicholas describes how in the Western church the man gives his betrothed an engagement ring. At the in 1215, convoked by, the was instituted, prohibiting clandestine marriages and requiring that marriages be made public in advance. Some[] legal scholars have seen in this a parallel with the engagement-ring tradition described by Pope Nicholas I.[]


The first well-documented use of a diamond ring to signify engagement was by the in imperial court of Vienna in 1477, upon his betrothal to. This then influenced those of higher social class and of significant wealth to give diamond rings to their loved ones.[]


During the the wedding ring replaced the betrothal ring as the primary ring associated with marriage. In Catholic countries the transition took place somewhat later.


During the both the and were popular, although the latter was more often used as an expression of sentiment than to indicate a formal engagement.

Victorian era[]

In South Africa, diamonds were first found in 1866, although they were not identified as such until 1867. By 1872, the output of the diamond mines exceeded one million carats per year. As production increased, those of lesser means were able to join in on this movement. However, diamond engagement rings were for a long time seen as the domain of the nobility and aristocracy, and tradition often favoured simpler engagement bands.[]

20th century[]

In the United States, the popularity of diamond engagement rings declined after World War I, even more so after the onset of the.

In 1938, the diamond cartel began a marketing campaign that would have a major impact on engagement rings. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, the price of diamonds collapsed. At the same time, market research indicated that engagement rings were going out of style with the younger generation. Before World War II, only 10% of American engagement rings contained a diamond. While the first phase of the marketing campaign consisted of market research, the advertising phase began in 1939. One of the first elements of this campaign was to educate the public about the 4 Cs (cut, carats, color, and clarity). In 1947 the slogan "a diamond is forever" was introduced. Ultimately, the De Beers campaign sought to persuade the consumer that an engagement ring is indispensable, and that a diamond is the only acceptable stone for an engagement ring.


In the 20th century, if he could afford it, the typical Western groom privately selected and purchased an engagement ring, which he then presented to his desired bride when he proposed marriage. In countries where both partners wear engagement rings, matching rings may be selected and purchased together. In the United States and Canada, where only women traditionally wear engagement rings, women also occasionally present their partners with an engagement gift.

Like all jewelry, the price for an engagement ring varies considerably depending on the materials used: the design of the ring, whether it includes a gemstone, the value of any gemstone, and the seller. The price of the, if any, in the ring depends on the type and quality of the gem. Diamonds have a that values them according to their carat weight, color, clarity and cut. Other gemstones, such as,,, have different systems. The jewelry may be chosen to honor a family tradition, to use family heirlooms, to have an unusual style, to have characteristics (e.g., a style that is not associated with controversy or the pollution caused by and ), to fit the individual's stylistic preferences, or to manage cost. Synthetic stones and diamond substitutes such as and are also popular choices that are socially responsible and reduce cost while maintaining the desired appearance.[]

The idea that a man should spend a significant fraction of his annual income for an engagement ring originated from marketing materials in the mid-20th century in an effort to increase the sale of. In the 1930s, they suggested that a man should spend the equivalent of one month's income in the engagement ring. In the 1980s, they suggested that he should spend two months' income on it. In 2012, the average cost of an engagement ring in the US as reported by the industry was US,000; in a 2015 scholarly study, almost a quarter of couples said that they did not buy a ring, and another third spent less than US00 on it. Less than 15% of couples spent,000 or more. In the UK, estimates of the average cost of an engagement ring range from £1200 to £2000. Scholarly research indicates that expensive engagement rings are associated with early divorces, possibly because spending more than US,000 on an engagement ring is strongly associated with debt-related stress. Couples that spend less money on engagement rings and the wedding ceremony tend to have longer marriages and a lower risk of divorce.

One reason for the increased popularity of expensive engagement rings is its relationship to and the woman's marriage prospects. In the United States, until the, a man who broke off a marriage engagement could be sued for. Monetary damages included actual expenses incurred in preparing for the wedding, plus damages for emotional distress and loss of other marriage prospects. Damages were greatly increased if the woman had engaged in with her fiancé. Beginning in 1935, these laws were repealed or limited. However, the social and financial cost of a broken engagement was no less: marriage was the only financially sound option for most women, and if she was no longer a virgin, her prospects for a suitable future marriage were greatly decreased. The diamond engagement ring thus became a source of financial security for the woman.

The online purchase of engagement rings is growing, disrupting the market for the diamonds by bringing greater transparency to an industry that has traditionally relied on opacity. Online diamond retailers and platforms include,, and.

Legal ownership[]

Tradition generally holds that if the betrothal fails because the man himself breaks off the engagement, the woman is not obliged to return the ring. This reflects the ring's role as a form of compensation for the woman's damaged reputation. Legally, this condition can be subject to either a modified or a strict fault rule. Under the former, the fiancé can demand the return of the ring unless he breaks the engagement. Under the latter, the fiancé is entitled to the return unless his actions caused the breakup of the relationship, the same as the traditional approach. However, a no-fault rule is being advanced in some jurisdictions, under which the fiancé is always entitled to the return of the ring. The ring only becomes the property of the woman when marriage occurs. An unconditional gift approach is another possibility, wherein the ring is always treated as a gift, to be kept by the fiancée whether or not the relationship progresses to marriage. Recent court rulings have determined that the date in which the ring was offered can determine the condition of the gift. E.g. and are widely recognized as gift giving holidays in the United States and some other countries. A ring offered in the form of a Christmas present is likely to remain the personal property of the recipient in the event of a breakup.

In most states of the United States, engagement rings are considered "conditional gifts" under the legal rules of property. This is an exception to the general rule that gifts cannot be revoked once properly given. See, for example, the case of Meyer v. Mitnick, 625 N.W.2d 136 (Michigan, 2001), whose ruling found the following reasoning persuasive: "the so-called 'modern trend' holds that because an engagement ring is an inherently conditional gift, once the engagement has been broken, the ring should be returned to the donor. Thus, the question of who broke the engagement and why, or who was 'at fault,' is irrelevant. This is the no-fault line of cases." Though in certain states, whether a judicial action can be maintained at all to require return of an engagement ring is blocked by statute, as many states have statutes which state that no civil action shall be maintained for breach of promise to marry.

One case in, ended in the man suing his former fiancée because she threw the ring away, after he told her she could keep it even though the marriage plans had fallen through. The Supreme Court of New South Wales held that, despite what the man said, the ring remained a conditional gift (partly because his saying that she could keep it reflected his desire to salvage the relationship) and she was ordered to pay him its A,250 cost.

In England and Wales, the gift of an engagement ring is presumed to be an absolute gift to the fiancée. This presumption may be rebutted however by proving that the ring was given on condition (express or implied) that it must be returned if the marriage did not take place, for whatever reason. This was decided in the case Jacobs v Davis (1917).

Engagement rings, like any other kind of jewelry, come in many different styles.

(Available in Yellow Gold, White Gold and Rose Gold) and are preferred for engagement rings, but common metal types such as,, and are also used for engagement rings. This allows for the bride-to-be to exert her own individual style into the ring in a simple manner.

In the United States, where engagement rings are worn by women, have been widely featured in engagement rings since the middle of the 20th century. Solitaire rings have one single diamond. The most common setting for engagement rings is the solitaire, which was popularized by in 1886 and its six-claw prong setting design sold under the "Tiffany setting" trademark. The modern favorite cut for an engagement ring is the brilliant cut, which provides the maximum amount of sparkle to the gemstone. The traditional engagement rings may have different prong settings and bands. Another major category is engagement rings with side stones. Rings with a larger diamond set in the middle and smaller diamonds on the side fit under this category. Three-stone diamond engagement rings, sometimes called trinity rings or trilogy rings, are rings with three matching diamonds set horizontally in a row with the bigger stone placed in the center. The three diamonds on the ring are typically said to represent the couple's past, present, and future, but other people give religious significance to the arrangement.

A wedding set, or bridal set, includes an engagement ring and a wedding band that matches and can be bought as a set. In some cases, the wedding ring looks "incomplete"; it is only when the two halves, engagement and wedding, are assembled that the ring looks whole. In other cases, a wedding set consists of two rings that match stylistically and are worn stacked, although either piece would look appropriate as a separate ring. Although the wedding band is not to be worn until the wedding day, the two rings are usually sold together as a wedding set. After the wedding, the bride may choose to have the two pieces welded together, to increase convenience and reduce the likelihood of losing one of the rings. A trio ring set includes a ladies engagement ring, ladies wedding band and a men's wedding band. These sets often have matching rings and are lower in price.

In, engagement rings are worn by both men and women. Traditionally they are plain gold bands, although more ornate designs and other materials are gaining popularity. The engagement rings resemble the wedding bands sold in the United States, whereas women's wedding rings may resemble US engagement rings.

In North America and the United Kingdom, it is customarily worn on the left hand. Similar traditions purportedly date to classical times, dating back from an early usage reportedly referring to the fourth finger of the left hand as containing the or "vein of love". This custom may have its origins in an ancient Egyptian myth that the finger contained a vein leading directly to the heart, or it may simply be because the heart lies slightly to the left side of the body. In the ring is worn on the left hand while engaged, but moved to the right hand when married. In Poland and Turkey, the engagement ring and wedding band are traditionally worn on the right hand but modern practice varies considerably.

For men[]

In some countries it is common for both men and women to wear engagement rings. The rings are often in the form of a plain band of a precious metal. Sometimes, the engagement ring eventually serves as the for the man. In Brazil, for example, the groom and bride-to-be usually wear a plain wedding band on the right hand during the course of their engagement. After the wedding, the band is moved to the left hand. In Argentina, it is also known for the groom and bride-to-be to wear a plain silver band on the left hand while engaged. Then, after the wedding the silver band is either replaced with the wedding ring or moved to the right hand.[]

Traditionally, women in the British Isles may propose marriage to men during a. Women proposing has become more common in recent years, to the point that some jewelry companies have started manufacturing men's engagement rings. They resemble typical men's rings, often with a diamond centrepiece. In the countries where both sexes have traditionally worn engagement rings, the rings tend to be plainer bands, and there is no real difference between men's and women's engagement ring designs.

See also[]

  • , a traditional Irish ring, often given or worn as a wedding ring
  • , a ring with stones creating the acronym D E A R E S T
  • , a ring with stones creating the acronym R E G A R D S
  • , a multi-part engagement ring fashionable in Europe rings during the 16th and 17th centuries
  • , sometimes called a "Turkish wedding ring"
  • , a modern mount
  • , a way of setting gems


  1. Toliver, Wendy (1 March 2003).. Sterling Publishing Company, Inc. pp. 19–20.  . Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  2. Patrick, Bethanne Kelly; Thompson, John Milliken (2009).. National Geographic Books. p. 81.  . Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  3. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. (1 May 2008).. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. p. 1623.  . Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  4. ^ Hersch, Karen K. (24 May 2010).. Cambridge University Press. pp. 41–42.  . Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  5. O'Rourke, Meghan (11 June 2007)... Retrieved 7 April 2013. 
  6. Kacirk, Jeffrey (17 February 1999).. HarperCollins. p. 190.  978-0-688-16636-6. Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  7. Holford-Strevens, Leofranc (6 November 2003).. Oxford University Press. p. 321.  . Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  8. Baker, Maureen (1 January 2001).. UBC Press. p. 34.  . Retrieved 7 November 2013. 
  9. William Smith, ed. (1890).. William Wayte, George Eden Marindin. J. Murray. p. 130. Retrieved 8 November 2013. 
  10. (1869).. C. Scribner and company. pp. 235–6. Retrieved 8 November 2013. 
  11. (1910).. Wm. S. Hein Publishing. p. 77.  . Retrieved 3 November 2013. 
  12. Stephen N. Scott (1980).. 
  13. Joseph Bingham (1846).. H. G. Bohn. p. 1215. Apud nostrates post sponsalia qua futurarum nuptiarum sunt promissio foedera quaeque consensu eorum qui haec contrahunt et eorum in quorum potestate sunt celebrantur. Postquam arris sponsam sibi sponsua per digitum fidei annulo insignitum desponderit... 
  14. Hesse, Rayner W. (1 January 2007).. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 76.  . Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  15. (1917). and Lond. p. 205. Retrieved 11 November 2013. 
  16. Todd A. Salzman; Michael G. Lawler (2008).. Georgetown University Press. p. 199.  . 
  17. White, Carolyn L. (8 September 2005).. Rowman Altamira. p. 94.  . Retrieved 5 November 2013. 
  18. Robert M. Hazen (22 July 1999).. Cambridge University Press. pp. 11–.  . 
  19. (1911). "Diamond".. 8 (11th ed.). Encyclopaedia britannica Company. p. 160. Retrieved 5 November 2013. 
  20. Reunert, Theodore (1893).. J. C. Juta & Co. p. 126. Retrieved 5 November 2013. 
  21. Russell, Rebecca Ross (5 June 2010).. Rebecca Ross Russell. p. 50.  . Retrieved 10 November 2013. 
  22. Magazine, Laurence Cawley BBC News.. BBC News. Retrieved 2016-03-06. 
  23. ^ Francis-Tan, Andrew; Mialon, Hugo M. (2014-09-15).. Rochester, NY. :. 
  24. Sullivan, J. Courtney (2013-05-03).. The New York Times.  . Retrieved 2016-03-06. 
  25. Dolan, Jenny (12 February 2007)... Wisconsin. 
  26. .. Columbia News Service. 4 April 2009. Archived from on 5 April 2009. Retrieved 2 June 2013. 
  27. Lee, Laura (October 2010).. p. 280.  . Retrieved 6 November 2013. 
  28. ^ Brinig, Margaret F. (Spring 1990). (PDF). The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 6 (1): 203–215. 
  29. . Forbes. October 4, 2016. 
  30. Grossman, Joanna (23 October 2001)... Retrieved 2 June 2013. 
  31. McConnell, J. Patrick.. The National Law Review. Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.  . Retrieved 15 September 2014.  See Also Cal. Civ.Code § 43.4, CONN. GEN. STAT. (2011) § 52-572b, The Heart Balm Act, §8.01-220 of the Code of Virginia,Colorado Rev.Stat. §13-20-202
  32. Kirby, Simon (18 May 2007)... Retrieved 2 June 2013. 
  33. . 1917. p. 389. Retrieved 2014-12-14. 
  34. Epstein, Edward Jay (1 February 1982)... Retrieved 2 June 2013. 
  35. .. Norwalk, Conn. 3 February 1979. p. 27. Retrieved 2 June 2013. 
  36. Myers, Rupert (7 May 2013)... London. Comment is free. Retrieved 2 June 2013. 

External links[]

Похожие новости

Maxi dress long sleeve 2018
2018 stylish medium haircuts for women
Taeyeon airport fashion 2018 photo
Diamond encrusted ferrari 2018
Uncut diamond ring 2018
Dressing mirror 2018
Zouhair murad story of luxury 2018